Blog Layout

Abu Dhabi Courts Set Aside an Arbitration Award For Failure Of Arbitrator To Disclose Potential Conflict of Interest

Jun 15, 2022

By Marc Massihi, Imad Kassir and Samer Abou Said


Introduction

This article considers, with reference to two recent Abu Dhabi courts judgments, the obligation of an Arbitrator to disclose the fact that he was working in the same law firm as the representative of one of the parties, and the impact of his failure to disclose this past relationship on his mandate and the validity of the arbitral award.


Background of dispute

An Arbitration Center (the “Center) nominated an Arbitrator based on Abu Dhabi Court’s request to resolve a dispute brought before the said Court, in accordance with the arbitration clause in the agreement.

The appointed Arbitrator accepted the appointment after submitting a statement of acceptance, impartiality and independence.


Before the Arbitral Award due date, the secretary of the arbitral tribunal sent a resignation email to the parties stating that her resignation was due to reasons related to the Arbitrator and the arbitral procedures. Shortly thereafter, the arbitral award was issued ordering the Respondent to pay AED 62M. 


The Respondent was uncomfortable with this announcement and commenced its own investigations and came to know that the Arbitrator used to previously work as a lawyer in the same law firm with the legal representative of the Claimant in the dispute, and that he might have been subject to disciplinary measure by the regulating authority.


Consequently, our firm representing the Respondent filed before Abu Dhabi Appeal Court, two different petitions: first one to revoke the Arbitrator and terminate his mandate for failure to disclose that he used to work with the legal representative of the Claimant, and the second done for nullification of the Arbitral Award. The grounds for the two petitions were: 


  1. First petition to revoke the Arbitrator’s mandate for the Arbitrator’s failure to disclose to the parties a fact that would likely give rise to doubts as to his impartiality and independence in accordance with Article (10.4) of the UAE Federal Law No. 6 for year 2018 (“Arbitration Law”);

  2. Second petition to set aside the arbitration award in accordance with Article (53)(f) of the Arbitration Law of 2018 due to the composition of the Tribunal being in breach of the Arbitration Law .



Judgment of the Court of Appeal (“CA”) of Abu Dhabi

The CA joined both petitions and issued in one judgment its decision regarding the two petitions to terminate the mandate of the Arbitrator and to nullify the Arbitral Award, in October 2021.


The CA highlighted in its reasoning that the obligation of disclosure is essential to ensure impartiality of the arbitration process and the Arbitrator. Such obligation shall remain until completion of the arbitration procedure, and the Arbitrator is obligated to disclose to the parties without delay, all the events that would likely to give rise to doubts as to his impartiality or independence, referring in its reasoning for comparative purposes to two foreign judgments that dealt with conflict of interests disputes. 


The CA further highlighted in its reasoning the validity of the Respondent’s claims: (i) nullification of the Arbitral Award due to the Arbitrator’s failure of disclosure as per article (10.4); and (ii) illegality of the Arbitrator’s mandate as a consequence of the illegality of his appointment in accordance with article (16) of the Arbitration Law of 2018. The CA considered these reasons sufficient for the nullification of the Arbitral Award in accordance with Article (53) of the same law.


The Claimant appealed to the Court of Cassation on the basis of error in the application of the law and flawed reasoning, focusing on two procedural aspects: The CA erred in (i) joining the two cases filed by the Respondent: termination of the Arbitrator’s mandate and nullification of Arbitral Award; (ii) ruling the nullification of the Arbitral Award based on the decision of terminating the mandate of the Arbitrator.


Judgment of the Court of Cassation (“COC”) of Abu Dhabi

The COC issued its judgment in January 2022. It stated that the joining of the two petitions to issue one judgment in both is merely a decision for the good conduct of justice, while preserving the independence of each of the cases and the means of appeal related to each of them.


Furthermore, the COC considered based on Article (15) of the Arbitration Law that the CA judgment regarding the termination of the Arbitrator’s assignment is not subject to challenge before the COC and approved the CA ruling regarding the nullification of the Arbitral Award based on Articles (10.4) and (53) of the Arbitration Law.


Conclusion

The CA and COC judgments underline the importance of the declaration of conflict of interest to the integrity of the arbitration proceedings. Furthermore, both courts determined that non-disclosure would lead to revoking the arbitration and nullification of the award regardless whether the failure to disclose a potential conflict of interest had an impact on the arbitration award or not. 


“Contents of this article are for general informational purposes only. It is not intended as professional counsel and should not be used as such.”


Amendments to UAE Legislations 2023
By Samer Abou Said 13 Jan, 2023
The UAE has introduced several legislative changes for the year 2023 similar to those we saw in 2022. We summarize in this article some of the changes, and we underline “some” because this should not be considered a comprehensive list or the only significant amendments.
Legal Updates Dubai Moves to Regulate Virtual Assets
24 May, 2022
The New Virtual assets Law In line with Dubai’s vision to become a key player in the virtual assets industry, the Government of Dubai issued new Law No. 4 of 2022 Regulating Virtual Assets (“the Law”), which came into force on the 11th of March 2022. The Law will apply across the Emirate of Dubai, including its freezones with the exception of Dubai International Financial Center (DIFC).
UK Passport Immigration Law
14 Apr, 2022
You can apply for British citizenship by quick naturalization if you are married to a British citizen and have lived in the UK for at least three years. If you are from any other country, you can usually apply for citizenship 12 months after receiving an indefinite residence permit (or an indefinite travel permit) if you are not married to a British citizen. If you are from the EU, Eastern Europe Region or Switzerland, you can apply for this option after living in the UK for five years, obtaining status for one year and meeting the general requirements for UK citizenship. Irish and EU / EFTA citizens who already have an ILR in the UK do not have to apply for the Settlement Scheme and can obtain British citizenship through ordinary naturalization.
05 Sep, 2021
Notification through the Court’s website This amendment allows the Court to take the decision to notify a litigant, whether an individual or a company, if not found on their address and under certain conditions, through the Court website. This new amendment will facilitate notification and, depending on how … Most Significant Amendments to the UAE Civil Procedures Law Adopted on 29 August 2021 Read More »
19 Jan, 2021
نظرة سريعة على الشيك كوسيلة سداد تعطي الدائن ضمانات هامة شكلت الشيكات إحدى ركائز التعامل التجاري في دولة الإمارات ولا تزال نظرا للحماية القانونية التي خصصها بها المشرع الإماراتي. فبالإضافة الى أن ساحب الشيك يكون مسؤولا مدنيا عن الوفاء بقيمة الشيك، هناك عقوبات جزائية مثل الحبس والغرامة التي يمكن أن تنزل بالموقع … أهم التعديلات التي طالت التعامل بالشيكات في دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة Read More »
11 Jan, 2021
The words of the Late H.H. Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, “Nothing pleases me more than seeing a woman take on her distinguished role in society, and nothing should hinder her progress.” In 2015, in line with this objective, the UAE Gender Balance Council was established to further … Gender Pay Gap: She Deserves The Same Read More »
11 Jan, 2021
It was announced that Drake and Scull International PJSC (“DSI”) made an application pursuant to Federal Decree Law No. (9) of 2016 on Bankruptcy for its financial reorganization process to be conducted under the supervision of the Financial Reorganization Committee (the FRC) which has accepted DSI’s request. Companies falling under DSIPursuant to … Creditors of Drake and Scull International PJSC Are Invited to Lodge Their Claims Against the Company Read More »
08 Jan, 2021
Federal Law No. (8) of 1980, as amended, governs the UAE Labor Law (the “Law”) and sets out the grounds upon which an employment contract may be terminated. However, it did not provide clear guidance on the options that would be legally available in the current … Employers’ and Employees’ Rights and Obligations under Resolution 279/2020 of the MOHRE Read More »
07 Jan, 2021
Dubai Courts issued a decision (No. 30 for year 2020) on 17 March 2020  to adjourn all hearings before Courts of Cassation, Appeal and First Instance falling in the period from 22 March 2020 until 16 April 2020. These hearings will be adjourned to a date after 16 April 2020. The … Dubai Courts Adjourn Hearings Read More »
By Moataz Abbasy 07 Jan, 2021
The Federal Law by Decree No. 19 of 2018 regarding Foreign Direct Investment (“FDI Law”) aimed to encourage foreign investment in certain sectors in the UAE through removing the requirement that 51% of the shares of a company be held by an Emirati individual or 100% Emirati owned company.On 17 March … The UAE Allows 100% Foreign Ownership of 122 Business Activities Read More »
More Posts
Share by: